top of page

Why is a Technical Expert Witness Essential in Patent Litigation?

  • Sutton Pierce
  • Jun 3
  • 2 min read

Technical Expert Witness

Patent litigation often centers on highly technical disputes—where even small details can carry big implications. That’s why technical expert witnesses are critical. These subject-matter experts help interpret complex technologies, assess patent claims, and provide credible testimony that can shape the outcome of a case.


Bridging the Gap Between Law and Technology


Patent cases often involve technologies that require deep, domain-specific knowledge—ranging from biotech innovations to software algorithms or manufacturing systems. A technical expert witness helps legal teams and the court confidently navigate those technical layers, ensuring decisions are grounded in both legal and scientific understanding.


Establishing Credibility and Validity


To determine whether a patent has been infringed—or whether it is even valid in the first place—courts turn to technical expert witnesses to analyze claims and evidence, interpret prior art*, explain how technology works, and offer opinions on whether infringement has occurred or whether the patent itself should stand. Their opinions often carry significant weight and can validate (or refute) arguments presented by legal counsel.


*prior art refers to information publicly available before the effective filing date of a patent application that may be relevant to determining the patentability of an invention.


Helping Jurors Make Informed Decisions


In cases decided by a jury, technical expert witnesses play a critical role in educating those without technical backgrounds. Through testimony, visual aids, and expert reports, they make complex information digestible, empowering jurors to make more informed and confident decisions.


How a Technical Expert Witness Supports Both Sides of the Case


Both plaintiffs and defendants in patent litigation benefit from hiring technical expert witnesses. Plaintiffs may need to prove that their patent has been infringed, while defendants often need to demonstrate differences in design, prior art, or lack of equivalence. In either scenario, the expert’s analysis is key.




 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

Sutton Pierce serves the entire country.

Our team is standing by to assist you.

Monday-Friday: 9am - 5pm

660 4th St #716 
San Francisco, CA 94107

STAY CONNECTED

Get industry news and insights, direct to your inbox.

*By signing up, you agree to receive emails from Sutton Pierce. You can unsubscribe from our mailing list at any time.

Thanks for signing up.

© 2020 by Sutton Pierce, LLC 

bottom of page